Skip to main content

A service of Otto Zickwolff GmbH, Germany

Dimension tables & drawingsVisit our shop →

Rule of thumb · applies

Name the edition – otherwise the one of the contract date applies: why “to EN 1092-1” is not enough

Name the edition – otherwise the one of the contract date applies.

A rule of thumb replaces neither the design calculation nor the applicable standard.

Category
robust rule
Standards referenced
EN 1092-1:2018, EN 10204, Directive 2014/68/EU (presumption of conformity), national forewords of the DIN EN editions

Rule of thumb

Whoever orders a standard without a year gets the edition that was current at the conclusion of the contract – and has to prove it later.

Where does the rule come from?

Standards change: EN 1092-1 appeared in 2001, 2007, 2013 and 2018, each edition with different material tables, raised faces or pressure-temperature values. A contract that only says “to EN 1092-1” does not fix the edition. By common understanding the one valid at the conclusion of the contract then applies – which ten years later nobody knows without the files. The rule comes from the ordering practice of the trade: every query “which edition?” costs a day, every missing edition costs more in a dispute.

What is technically correct?

A standard becomes binding through the contract, not by itself. The order line therefore carries standard, edition, part, type, pressure rating, nominal size, material and type of certificate: “weld neck flange EN 1092-1:2018 type 11 PN 16 DN 100 P250GH, 3.1 to EN 10204”. Whoever wants the latest edition writes “in the respectively valid version” – and then bears the risk that the standard changes during the term. Both are permissible; neither goes without saying.

Where does the rule end?

  • Harmonised standards under the Pressure Equipment Directive: only the edition listed in the Official Journal carries the presumption of conformity – here the list decides, not the contract.
  • Framework agreements with a term: if a new edition appears, a sentence in the contract on whether it applies helps; otherwise the old one continues.
  • Company standards and operator specifications often name their own edition of the cited standard – it takes precedence.
  • Withdrawn standards: whoever expressly orders to DIN 2633 gets the dimensionally identical flange to EN 1092-1 type 11 – the certificate names the standard tested.

What does the standard say?

The standards themselves regulate their edition only in the designation: EN 1092-1:2018 is the 2018 edition, DIN EN 1092-1:2018-12 the German version with month of publication; amendments (A1) and corrigenda (AC) are separate documents. The national foreword names the replaced edition and the changes. What a citation in a contract means, no standard says – that is contract law, and this rule is not legal advice.

DIN/EN versus ASME/ASTM

In the ASME world the edition is part of the designation: ASME B16.5-2020 or B16.5-2025, and the code (B31.3) names in its tables which edition of the product standards it recognises. The trap is the same as with EN: an order “to ASME B16.5” without a year leaves open whether the flange thickness of the 2003 edition (without raised face) or an earlier one is meant. ASTM material standards carry the year as a suffix (A105/A105M-21) – certificates state it.

Worked example

An enquiry names “flanges to DIN 2633”. The standard has been withdrawn since 2005; the dimensionally identical flange is today EN 1092-1 type 11 PN 16. If the customer orders “to DIN 2633”, we supply the type 11 flange with certificate to EN 1092-1:2018 – and write the replacement on the order confirmation so that nobody later looks for a standard that no longer exists. If he orders “to EN 1092-1” without a year, we ask if the contract is older than the 2018 edition.

Zickwolff reference

No company lore for this rule.

Checked today

Verdict: applies (class A). The rule follows contract practice and the forewords of the standards; it is a reading, not legal information.

Further reading

Frequently asked questions

What applies if no edition is named?

By common understanding the edition valid at the conclusion of the contract. In case of doubt the contract clarifies it – or a contract review.

May I supply a newer edition than ordered?

If it meets the one ordered or is dimensionally identical, usually yes – the certificate then names the edition tested. Where materials or dimensions changed between editions, agree beforehand.

Does this apply to material standards too?

Yes. EN 10222-2:2017 and its predecessor differ in test scope and designation; the certificate names the edition.

All rules of thumb

Your inquiry to Zickwolff

Send us what you have – designation, standard, quantity, date. We will clarify the rest with you.