Skip to main content

A service of Otto Zickwolff GmbH, Germany

Dimension tables & drawingsVisit our shop →

Press systems · Tool

Cost comparison calculator: what does the joint cost – pressed, welded, grooved or flanged?

The press connector costs more than the butt-welding fitting; the weld seam costs more time, qualification and ancillary work. Whether the material premium pays off is decided not by the brochure but by your project: how many joints, which size, which hourly rate, how much fire watch and testing – and what an hour of downtime costs. This calculator puts these quantities side by side for press, welding, grooved and flange: with two inputs as a time comparison, with hourly rate and your figures as a cost comparison. It is a model, not an offer – and it does not replace costing or the manufacturer approval.

Methods
press · welding · grooved/coupling · flange · thread
Mandatory
size · fittings
Optional
hourly rate, working conditions, fitters, minutes, material, ancillary work, downtime
Presets
assembly times per method and size class as rough guide values – editable

Economy calculator: time, cost, downtime

Show method
Fittings (at least one)

Count reducers and reducing tees as a coupling or tee of the larger size.

Fields marked * are required. Without an hourly rate the calculator compares time only.

Calculate in more detail: fitters, minutes, material, ancillary work, downtime

A model calculation with your parameters - it replaces neither the quotation nor the manufacturer approval. No prices are stated.

Worked example: two scenarios, time only

Calculated with this calculator’s defaults and fictitious inputs. Without material and without prices: press fittings cost more than weld fittings – that belongs in your own calculation.

  • A: new build, heating distribution DN 50 in a hall – DN 32-50, 6 elbows, 2 tees, 1 couplings (= 20 joints), Working conditions: normal – building site.
  • B: maintenance, cooling water line DN 50 during running production – DN 32-50, 3 elbows, 2 tees (= 12 joints), Working conditions: difficult – existing plant, confined, at height.
Worked example: assembly time and plant downtime per method (hours, defaults, fictitious inputs)
MethodA: assembly time [h]B: assembly time [h]B: plant downtime [h]
press connection1.71.41.4
welding7.86.27.2
threaded connection4.33.43.4
flange connection20.516.417.4

Plant downtime = assembly time, for hot work (welding, flange) plus 1 h of follow-up inspection (assumption for this example). Grooved couplings are not in the example: in practice they are used from DN 65.

How to calculate

  • Time comparison: size and the fittings are enough – the calculator counts the joints from them (elbow 2, tee 3, socket 2) and shows the assembly time per method. Count reducers and reducing tees as a socket or tee of the larger size; with the calculator's broad size classes a reducer usually stays in the same class. The working conditions scale all methods evenly: good for workshop and free access, normal for the site, difficult for work in existing buildings, in confined spaces or at height.
  • Cost comparison: with your hourly rate the costs are added. Under “Calculate in more detail” you enter fitters, material cost per fitting, set-up time, testing and – only for hot work – fire watch and permit. As soon as fixed costs or material are entered, the calculator states from how many fittings a method pays off against the chosen reference.
  • Downtime: for industry and maintenance, enter the downtime cost per hour. With production running, assembly time is often the smallest item – what decides is how long the line has to be empty and cold.

Where the presets come from – and why you should change them

The assembly times per method and size class are presets – rough guide values and experience values, not measurements from your site. They apply to one joint under good conditions, including cutting to length and setting up, and they stand on the same basis for press, grooved, thread and welding, so that no method is favoured by the choice of figures. How far your site deviates from that – access, installation position, weather, wall thickness – you set with the working conditions; they apply equally to all methods. For orientation, a range for site conditions is shown beside the values. The flange is calculated as bolting; the welding-on of the two flanges is added by the calculator as two weld seams. For sizes from DN 125 there is no preset – there the calculator works with your times. Manufacturer claims such as “up to 60 % less time than welding” (Viega Megapress, up to 80 % in XL) we quote as such on the system pages; they do not enter the calculation as a figure. Every time can be overwritten. Whoever has their own experience values – from the last project, from the post-calculation – enters them and gets a result that fits their business. Size, position, access, material and wall thickness change the times considerably; the calculator reflects that through the size class and your set-up time, not through a formula that knows everything.

What the calculator cannot do

It does not check whether a method is permissible for your application at all – that is what the system finder does for medium, pipe and size and the comparison matrix for the technical criteria. It knows no tariffs, no surcharges, no regions and no prices; material costs are your input. It calculates with averages per size class, not with your specific installation position. And it replaces neither the contractor's costing, nor the design, nor the manufacturer's approval. What it can do: put the quantities that are usually only felt in the “press or weld” discussion into an order – traceably, with visible assumptions, for your figures.

Pipe, connectors and fittings for your result

Tell us method, size, material and quantity – we come back with availability, from stock or to order, and deliver everything for pressing, welding, grooving or flanging from one warehouse.

Send an inquiry

Your inquiry to Zickwolff

Send us what you have – designation, standard, quantity, date. We will clarify the rest with you.

← Back to the joining methods comparison

Technical basis: presets of the assembly times per method and size class as rough guide values on a uniform basis for all methods, supplemented by experience values from our consulting. The calculator is a model calculation without prices; all inputs are the user's assumptions. Information without guarantee – it does not replace costing, design or manufacturer approval.